<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Problem with Requirements Engineering tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nwcadence.com/2007/11/the-problem-with-requirements-engineering-tools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nwcadence.com/2007/11/the-problem-with-requirements-engineering-tools/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on VSTS, Sharepoint and other collaborative technologies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:06:24 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Babcock &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Business Analysis &#8220;Artist&#8221; and the Requirement Tools of the Trade</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwcadence.com/2007/11/the-problem-with-requirements-engineering-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Babcock &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Business Analysis &#8220;Artist&#8221; and the Requirement Tools of the Trade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 03:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwcadence.com/2007/11/16/the-problem-with-requirements-engineering-tools/#comment-82</guid>
		<description>[...] wanted to share and comment on a post I came across the other day that points out the potential drawback of requirements management tools. Per Jeff Levinson at Northwest Cadence: There seems to be a growing move towards using tools [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wanted to share and comment on a post I came across the other day that points out the potential drawback of requirements management tools. Per Jeff Levinson at Northwest Cadence: There seems to be a growing move towards using tools [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Requirements are not dead. :: Where Technology Meets Teamwork</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwcadence.com/2007/11/the-problem-with-requirements-engineering-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Requirements are not dead. :: Where Technology Meets Teamwork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 23:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwcadence.com/2007/11/16/the-problem-with-requirements-engineering-tools/#comment-78</guid>
		<description>[...] has written about this problem and others in several blog posts, most noticably in his post on the problems of Requirements Engineering tools.  It&#8217;s also a very frequent discussion over the water cooler here at Northwest Cadence.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has written about this problem and others in several blog posts, most noticably in his post on the problems of Requirements Engineering tools.  It&#8217;s also a very frequent discussion over the water cooler here at Northwest Cadence.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
