<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Where Technology Meets Teamwork</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nwcadence.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nwcadence.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on VSTS, Sharepoint and other collaborative technologies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 05:36:54 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Problem with Requirements Engineering tools by JayCharly</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwcadence.com/2007/11/the-problem-with-requirements-engineering-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>JayCharly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 05:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwcadence.com/2007/11/16/the-problem-with-requirements-engineering-tools/#comment-114</guid>
		<description>I think there&#039;s a misconception about requirements management here. RM is not about gathering better requirements, it is about managing the requirements life-cycle so that creation, removal, updating and deletion operations are performed in an organized and controlled way. Therefore, anyone who uses an RM tool should not expect to improve the internal quality of the requirements produced.
I agree with you about encouraging the development of communicative skills in order to promote a better understanding between analysts and stakeholders when eliciting requirements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s a misconception about requirements management here. RM is not about gathering better requirements, it is about managing the requirements life-cycle so that creation, removal, updating and deletion operations are performed in an organized and controlled way. Therefore, anyone who uses an RM tool should not expect to improve the internal quality of the requirements produced.<br />
I agree with you about encouraging the development of communicative skills in order to promote a better understanding between analysts and stakeholders when eliciting requirements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TechEd 2009: We&#8217;re #2 (And #3, and #4) by VSTS Links – 05/27/2009 - Team System News - Team System Rocks</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwcadence.com/2009/05/teched-2009-were-2-and-3-and-4/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>VSTS Links – 05/27/2009 - Team System News - Team System Rocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwcadence.com/?p=212#comment-111</guid>
		<description>[...] Northwest Cadence Blog on Tech Ed 2009:&#160; We’re #2 (and #3 and #4)  Posted May 28 2009, 08:06 AM by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Northwest Cadence Blog on Tech Ed 2009:&#160; We’re #2 (and #3 and #4)  Posted May 28 2009, 08:06 AM by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TechEd 2009: We&#8217;re #2 (And #3, and #4) by steven.shippee</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwcadence.com/2009/05/teched-2009-were-2-and-3-and-4/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>steven.shippee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 20:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwcadence.com/?p=212#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Anyone have any experience using &quot;.NET WebService Studio&quot; to invoke web methods interactively?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone have any experience using &#8220;.NET WebService Studio&#8221; to invoke web methods interactively?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Radio TFS Episode on Adopting Team System with Steven Borg by VSTS Links - 04/03/2009 - Team System News - Team System Rocks</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwcadence.com/2009/03/new-radio-tfs-episode-on-adopting-team-system-with-steven-borg/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>VSTS Links - 04/03/2009 - Team System News - Team System Rocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwcadence.com/?p=208#comment-109</guid>
		<description>[...] The NWCadence Blog on New Radio TFS Episode on Adopting Team System with Steven Borg [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The NWCadence Blog on New Radio TFS Episode on Adopting Team System with Steven Borg [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TFS Reporting Session at Seattle Code Camp by steven.shippee</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwcadence.com/2008/11/tfs-reporting-session-at-seattle-code-camp/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>steven.shippee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwcadence.com/?p=139#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Did you end up with a handly little list of all reports and what they do/describe out of this you can share with others perhaps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you end up with a handly little list of all reports and what they do/describe out of this you can share with others perhaps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TFS 2008 October Power Tools Released by steven.shippee</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwcadence.com/2008/11/tfs-2008-october-power-tools-released/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>steven.shippee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwcadence.com/?p=148#comment-106</guid>
		<description>With all of these tools one would think there would be an easier way to tell wich version of TFS 2008 one has installed, besides going into the registry and looking at KEY:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE
  \SOFTWARE
    \Microsoft
      \VisualStudio
        \9.0
          \TeamFoundation
            \Registration
which I had to do because I had erroneously installed the TRIAL version of TFS 2008 and was getting error messages that it was about to expire.  Then I had to go into add/remove programs and re-enter the key, the permanent key this time.  Is there an easier way to do this (yet)?  Thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all of these tools one would think there would be an easier way to tell wich version of TFS 2008 one has installed, besides going into the registry and looking at KEY:<br />
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE<br />
  \SOFTWARE<br />
    \Microsoft<br />
      \VisualStudio<br />
        \9.0<br />
          \TeamFoundation<br />
            \Registration<br />
which I had to do because I had erroneously installed the TRIAL version of TFS 2008 and was getting error messages that it was about to expire.  Then I had to go into add/remove programs and re-enter the key, the permanent key this time.  Is there an easier way to do this (yet)?  Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Practical Process Improvement (Part 5) by Jeff Levinson</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwcadence.com/2008/12/practical-process-improvement-part-5/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Levinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwcadence.com/?p=165#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Great article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Issues with Alerts in TFS by VSTS Links - 03/09/2009 - Team System News - Team System Rocks</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwcadence.com/2009/03/issues-with-alerts-in-tfs/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>VSTS Links - 03/09/2009 - Team System News - Team System Rocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwcadence.com/2009/03/02/issues-with-alerts-in-tfs/#comment-104</guid>
		<description>[...] The Northwest Candence Blog on Issues with Alerts in TFS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Northwest Candence Blog on Issues with Alerts in TFS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Issues with Alerts in TFS by steven.shippee</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwcadence.com/2009/03/issues-with-alerts-in-tfs/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>steven.shippee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwcadence.com/2009/03/02/issues-with-alerts-in-tfs/#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Does this look about right as content returned from tbl_security_identity_cache?

S-1-5-19	2	LOCAL SERVICE
S-1-5-21-1033714835-1844704717-3293601285-1003	2	shis235
S-1-5-21-1033714835-1844704717-3293601285-1008	2	TFSSetup
S-1-5-21-1033714835-1844704717-3293601285-1009	2	TFSService
S-1-5-21-1033714835-1844704717-3293601285-1010	2	WSSService
S-1-5-21-1033714835-1844704717-3293601285-1011	2	TFSReports
S-1-5-21-1033714835-1844704717-3293601285-1012	2	TFSProxy
S-1-5-21-1033714835-1844704717-3293601285-500	2	Administrator
S-1-9-1551374245-1204400969-2402986413-2179408616-0-0-0-0-1 ... TFS Stuff

It looks like SIDS that start with S-1-5 are regular entities while those that deal with TFS/SQL start with S-1-9, is that a constant or does it vary more than this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this look about right as content returned from tbl_security_identity_cache?</p>
<p>S-1-5-19	2	LOCAL SERVICE<br />
S-1-5-21-1033714835-1844704717-3293601285-1003	2	shis235<br />
S-1-5-21-1033714835-1844704717-3293601285-1008	2	TFSSetup<br />
S-1-5-21-1033714835-1844704717-3293601285-1009	2	TFSService<br />
S-1-5-21-1033714835-1844704717-3293601285-1010	2	WSSService<br />
S-1-5-21-1033714835-1844704717-3293601285-1011	2	TFSReports<br />
S-1-5-21-1033714835-1844704717-3293601285-1012	2	TFSProxy<br />
S-1-5-21-1033714835-1844704717-3293601285-500	2	Administrator<br />
S-1-9-1551374245-1204400969-2402986413-2179408616-0-0-0-0-1 &#8230; TFS Stuff</p>
<p>It looks like SIDS that start with S-1-5 are regular entities while those that deal with TFS/SQL start with S-1-9, is that a constant or does it vary more than this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Compelling TFS Features to Upgrade from 2005 to 2008 by VSTS Links - 02/02/2009 - Team System News - Team System Rocks</title>
		<link>http://blog.nwcadence.com/2009/01/compelling-tfs-features-to-upgrade-from-2005-to-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>VSTS Links - 02/02/2009 - Team System News - Team System Rocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nwcadence.com/?p=174#comment-102</guid>
		<description>[...] Northwest Cadence Blog on Compelling TFS Features to Upgrade from 2005 to 2008  Posted Feb 02 2009, 08:28 AM by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Northwest Cadence Blog on Compelling TFS Features to Upgrade from 2005 to 2008  Posted Feb 02 2009, 08:28 AM by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
